Home › Forums › Diamondhead Country Club and Property Owners Assoc › POA Board of Directors › Ammenities Sale to Jacobs Casino Group
May 21, 2014 at 12:04 pm #6880
Any comments about the proposal to transfer the amenities (golf course, swimming pool, tennis courts, etc.) to Jacobs Casino Group? See attached file.May 21, 2014 at 12:35 pm #6879
Yeah ! This is going to be like poking a hornets nest with a sharp stick.May 21, 2014 at 12:44 pm #6881
Thanks for posting the “Contribution and Option Agreement” so POA Members can read it BEFORE the “Open” Meeting tonight at 6pm at the Community Center. The “Closed” Meeting starts at 5pm.
[POA Decisions are discussed and MADE in Closed meetings and DISCLOSED at Open meetings.]
Members should attend tonight’s meeting to see what is “DISCLOSED” about this important proposed Agreement to lease/sell our amenities. According to the Agenda, Members will have the opportunity to ask questions, which usually must be written on a form and submitted at the meeting.May 21, 2014 at 12:45 pm #6882
What entity would then collect the POA dues? And what changes might current members expect in the use of amenities and privileges?May 21, 2014 at 1:00 pm #6883
There are many concerns about this!! Why drop this on the members when the election is so close. The new board should have a voice in this, not this group? One of the big things to be concerned about is para II c, which extends the initial term lease option of 10 years to additional terms totaling 50 years. Does this board expect the POA not to begin expiring in 2020? All this basically free stuff to Jacobs guests is a laugher if not so abhorrent!!!May 21, 2014 at 1:01 pm #6884
QueenMercury – 2014-05-21 2:45 PM
What entity would then collect the POA dues? And what changes might current members expect in the use of amenities and privileges?
It does no good to ask those questions here. Go to the meeting and ask them.May 21, 2014 at 1:04 pm #6885
I really cannot see a casino hotel being built without its own pool facility.May 21, 2014 at 1:07 pm #6886
It is not a matter of who collects the dues. It’s who gives them the right to sell my property!!!!!!. I can’t believe the Golfer’s aren’t carrying signs and protesting the sale of one of their golf courses and taking control over the other. Seems there is no limit to what they will do to get what they want no matter how much it hurts the rest of us.
I’ll bet the fix is aready in and the deal already done. He’s got his 6 rubber stamped votes. Don’t worry you will still be able to get a tee time after 5:30pm on thursdays…..
PLEASE VOTE !!!!!!!!! PLEASE VOTE !!!!!!!!!! Take back control of our community!!!!!May 21, 2014 at 1:17 pm #6887
Why are we just hearing about this now?????May 21, 2014 at 1:40 pm #6888
Maybe the POA board (or at least six) should be tarred and feathered and run out of town.May 21, 2014 at 2:38 pm #6889
Who owns ” Diamondhead Properties”, that is the other party to this agreement not the Jacobs group, I was under the impression that Diamondhead Properties was the Percell organization? Confuseing to me who we are doing business with. Just not enough info.May 21, 2014 at 3:23 pm #6891
I say we band together and call a special meeting of the DPOA. In accordance with our bylaws: Section 3.2 Special Meeting. A special meeting of the members of the Corporation may be called at any time by a majority of the Directors, the President, or by at least ten percent (10%) of the members of the Corporation except as otherwise provided by statute or in the articles of incorporation or any amendment thereto.
Section 3.4: In the case of special meetings, no business other than that specified in the notice of meeting shall be transacted at such special meeting.
Section 3.7: On any matter other than the election of Officers and Directors which may come before a membership meeting, members in good standing shall be entitled to cast one vote for each parcel of property owned by them and upon which assessments are being charged (other than exempt developer lots).
Doesn’t anyone here have a legal background and could lead the charge to file an injunction?May 21, 2014 at 3:54 pm #6892
Link to MS SOS listing of Diamondhead Real Estate, LLC.May 21, 2014 at 4:24 pm #6893
Evidently, we are “subjects” and not “owners” by the board. Because of past complacency, we’re not considered for consultation.May 21, 2014 at 4:41 pm #6894
We are members of the corporation and do have some power. By the way, if the property south of I-10 belongs to the dpoa, us, why is it a foregone conclusion that we even want a casino there?
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.