Inauguration

This topic contains 8 replies, has 297 voices, and was last updated by  khm 4 years ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #5561

    khm
    Participant

    Anyone know the actual reason why the inauguration of the mayor and council was postponed from 6/25 to 7/1? (at least according to the Sea Coast Echo.) I’ve been around for quite a while and I have never heard of postponing an inauguration because of scheduling conflicts!

    #5560

    Squaredeal
    Member

    To be very frank with you khm, I am learning that these small time crooks(read politicians) can do anything they want

    #5586

    teled
    Member

    well, I do know the newly elected mayor is remaining on the POA board so I’m sure there will be MANY scheduling conflicts in the future!!!!!!

    #5590

    lisal
    Member

    Talk about conflict of interest if he does stay on the POA BOARD, I guess their growing. Now the POA has two offices,the original and now the City Hall. I didn’t think he could stay on the POA board and be the mayor at the same time.

    #5605

    Michael Schaefer
    Participant

    1. The following is a quoted paragraph from the ACLU lawsuit against the city of Diamondhead.

    “2. The POA is a “state actor” with regard to these provisions because it is inexorably intertwined with the City of Diamondhead. Among other reasons, POA rules, regulations, bylaws and covenants regulate all—or at least nearly all—residential properties within the City of Diamondhead and the POA and City act as, and hold themselves out to be, interconnected entities.

    3. Since our current mayor is also on the POA board one can clearly see that the POA and the city are interconnected entities. Consequently, we cannot win the ACLU lawsuit against the city. Therefore we should contact Elton Kyger and other board members and express our stance about spending any additional money on this losing lawsuit.

    #5607

    lisal
    Member

    I disagree!!!!!! We don’t need 2 POAs. One is bad enough.

    #5609

    Michael Schaefer
    Participant

    Perhaps my comments are misunderstood. We (POA) can’t win the lawsuit the ACLU has filed against us (POA restrictions on freedom of speech by city residents through the covenants) so let’s not waste our money paying lawyers in an to attempt to win.

    #5647

    Michael Schaefer
    Participant

    I wonder what our new MAYOR and new city council members think about the previous mayor and city council members when Chancellor Schloegel
    stated in her decision on July 22, 2013 relative to the Diamondhead Baptist Church that:

    “THE LEGISLATURE INTENDED STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH ALL PROVISIONS OF THE MUNICIPAL BUDGET LAW OF TITLE 21 AND FAILURE TO DO CARRIES A CRIMINAL PENALTY” The previous Diamondhead Mayor & city council failed to comply with this law. Therefore are they criminals?
    l

    #5649

    wayne king
    Participant

    Its no excuse for violation of the law, PERIOD. Especially when its done excluding public scrutiny to avoid criticism and hide self serving interest.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.